The other day, I was at the supermarket buying food. After placing some stuff in my shopping cart and going to the checkout line, I found that customers were being encouraged to donate two dollars to a local charity which was in serious need of donations. The money would simply be added to the shopper's grocery bill, and so it was an easy way to make a small donation to the less fortunate. It was very nice and I donated two dollars myself, but after I thought about it for a while, I realized something seemed wrong about it. Think about your grocery bill; When was the last time it was two dollars? Unless you are Richard Simmons, it is probably at least ten times that much, and that's generally just for one week's worth of food. Although the two-dollar donation was a nice gesture, truly, it would do very little to help anyone. In this way, many people in the more developed countries tend to make themselves feel better with small gestures that are not very helpful. Often people give tiny donations to charities that would requires millions of dollars if they were to ever realize their goals. Certainly these people are helping a small number of people, but in the end, this kind of gesture may actually make things worse by making people feel that they have done their part by giving a few cents to a charity, when in fact so much more needs to be done. People are distressed by what they read or hear about in the news, and they try to console themselves by making tiny gestures, giving themselves a false sense of peace. It's nice that people even think about their less fortunate fellow-people, but the simple fact is that they are not doing enough to help. Part of the problem is that there is just not that much money to go around. Even in North America, where it is popularly believed (by people who do not live there) that everyone is rich, most people are not truly rich; The majority of people are "well off", which is not at all the same thing as being rich. Being well off means that you are able to live from day to day with basic living standards like shelter, food, and transportation, without serious problems like being in debt or being very hungry. Most people in North America can handle that, and even have a bit of money left over for small luxuries like televisions and other items of entertainment. But most people are not actaully so endowed with money that they can afford to pass around significant amounts of money to other people; They typically have only a little left over after their basic expenses are paid, and this they spend on themselves, buying "the things that make life worthwhile", i.e. entertainment. There are only a few people in North America who are so rich that they could actually buy food for several other people in the world. Most of these really rich folks do not do so. But a deeper part of the problem is human nature, which in most people tends not to focus on the big picture in life. People do not even think about how their actions affect the world around them; They only concern themselves with how their actions affect their own sphere. Perhaps worse, they usually think only in the short term, not in the long term. Indeed, even genuinely poor people will often squander any money they receive, spending it on things that make them feel good or happy rather than things that they need. As a strong example, many homeless people spend most of their money on drugs, simply because those drugs make them feel good, even though it would be better for their physical and mental well-being overall if they spent their money on food. It seems clear, then, that the blame does not lie squarely on the rich people for not sharing their money, but also on the poor people for suffering from the same "only thinking about themselves" mindset as the rich. It should also be clear that strong, concentrated effort is required to fix the problems in the world. Giving two dollars to a person who needs it now and then is a nice gesture, but it does virtually nothing to fix the serious problems that run deep through our world. Indeed, fixing the world will take more time, effort and money than you (or anyone else in this world) has to offer, and this is what makes people give up without even trying. It's the kind of situation where some few people need to take the initiative and do the right thing even if most people aren't. I believe that as long as humans live in this world, most people will continue to do the wrong thing. But that doesn't mean you have to.